| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Ecce Drihten
   |
Posted - 2006.06.02 05:02:00 -
[1]
No Nighthawk changes in the patch notes yet. I was starting to hope when I saw the list of all the adjustments being made to ship boni.
It looks like we stay gimped for another month.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.06.16 17:45:00 -
[2]
It keeps going... Its amazing with all the changes to ships this patch, the NH still gets 0. Yet other ships with 0 complaints get upgraded.
Also, at first I thought what most people think.... wait until assault missles. Let's see what those do on a NH and then decide. Maybe that will un-nerf the ship.
But 3 out of 4 boni on the NH are HEAVY MISSLE SPECIFIC. So either they will need to change anyways to assault missle specific or we will get a great new missle and have to waste 3/4 of the ships boni by using it instead of heavies.
This makes no sense!
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.06.17 04:13:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Xendie
doesnt ALL Command ships have crappy range?
nighthawk 50k
Vulture 60k
Absolution 50k
Damnation 50k
Astarte 55k
Eos 55k
Claymore 45k
Sleipner 45k
looks like Caldari got the longest range with the Vulture and minmatars the suckiest with 45k
nighthawk dont need range boosted the minmatar ones need it more to get up inline with the other commandships imho
Take a closer look at the vulture. The reason problem is that it has 2 OPTIMAL RANGE boni to medium turrets.
This is useless when the ship can only target 60km.
Either the target range needs to be extended to take advatage of the boni or they need to be changed to something useful.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.01 02:19:00 -
[4]
Hard to believe this is still going on....
We really need to get the boni adjusted or get those new assault missles AND get the boni adjusted!! It seems like we will need to wait until Kali.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.14 02:32:00 -
[5]
Bump-
this still needs some looking into, and an answer.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.17 20:38:00 -
[6]
Why are we on page 6? This still has not been fixed... so it needs to go back to page 1!!
Really, why has this not been looked at. I think the Alliance Tournament would have clearly shown tht while the NH can tank, it can't kill. It can't even easily kill the frigs the devs INSIST this is meant to pop.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 03:29:00 -
[7]
Or that they are busy developing assault missles to fix it. News of that would be nice though.....
At least give us hope!
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.18 20:19:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Necrologic
Forums glitched on the above post and won't let me edit it. I meant to say that assault missiles won't fix the problem, as was stated earlier.
I know, I posted on that several pages ago. It is a start though, and shows that they at least INTEND to come up with some solution.
Even with assualt missles, the boni would have to change as we would no longer use HEAVY missle boni. Besides, the precision skills are still worthless and needs to change to ROF to make us get even close to the other command ships.
Snce the devs seem to think that assualt missles will fix all this, I would LOVE to hear when they are coming out and see some specs on them.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 23:01:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Andrea Jaruwalski
Are you going to stop to wish for a "i win. 1 volley frigate ship"?
I dont think ANYONE wants this to be a frig popper... read the last 19 pages. Anyone but CCP that is, that gives us boni that attempt do that (and fail miserably at it).
That is the issue with this ship, its a bad attempt at a frig popper that no one wants. Has it not been said enough, we have anti-frig ships... give us more!
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 23:06:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Double TaP
Especially when if you look at the last page, I quoted CCP HAMMER saying "were looking at the bonuses". The thread has served its purpose. They're working on it. The fix wont be for a couple months most likely, but they are doing something at least. Even if they dont totally fix it.
Have you read all the contradictory information on the assault missles coming out?
There has never to my knowledge been anything more than.... 'we are looking into them' 'they might be made' 'they would be cool and solve everything'.
We have no timeline, not even a soon(TM), no stats, no comment on how the boni will change (from heavy missle --> assualt missle related).
For those who trained for 1-3 months to use the NH, it really is sad.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.07.20 23:10:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Nekora
1) Yes it tanks well, not the best FiCS tank but still good, thats not the issue. Damage is.
2) Has anyone tryed a passive tank on this yet?
The passive tank rocks. That is the reason I still love and want this ship fixed so badly.
It can tank beautifully, it just can't damage back much as you said.
|
Ecce Drihten
|
Posted - 2006.08.01 20:54:00 -
[12]
Originally by: Tuxford
Originally by: Ithildin
Will the Drake have the Nighthawk's hated missile navigation prediction bonus?
No, and it seems unlikely that Nighthawk keeps his
Great news this week. That and BC agility being increased. It seems we need to wait for Kali, but at least we know its being fixed.
|
| |
|